4.7 Article

Degradation of caffeine by photo-Fenton process: Optimization of treatment conditions using experimental design

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages 170-175

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.06.022

Keywords

Advanced oxidation processes; Sewage treatment plant; Stimulant; Surface response methodology; Surface water; Sunlight

Funding

  1. FAPEMIG [2011-EXA022, CEX-APQ-00915-11, CEX-APQ-01798-11, CEX-APQ-02425-10]
  2. CNPq [2011-EXA002, 300.587/2008-2]
  3. CAPES
  4. PROPP-UFU [052-2010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The degradation of caffeine in different kind of effluents, via photo-Fenton process, was investigated in lab-scale and in a solar pilot plant. The treatment conditions (caffeine, Fe2+ and H2O2 concentrations) were defined by experimental design. The optimized conditions for each variable, obtained using the response factor (% mineralization), were: 52.0 mg L-1 caffeine, 10.0 mg L-1 Fe2+ and 42.0 mg L-1 H2O2 (replaced in kinetic experiments). Under these conditions, in ultrapure water (UW), the caffeine concentration reached the quantitation limit (0.76 mg L-1) after 20 min, and 78% of mineralization was obtained respectively after 120 min of reaction. Using the same conditions, the matrix influence (surface water - SW and sewage treatment plant effluent - STP) on caffeine degradation was also evaluated. The total removal of caffeine in SW was reached at the same time in UW (after 20 min), while 40 min were necessary in STP. Although lower mineralization rates were verified for high organic load, under the same operational conditions, less H2O2 was necessary to mineralize the dissolved organic carbon as the initial organic load increases. A high efficiency of the photo-Fenton process was also observed in caffeine degradation by solar photocatalysis using a CPC reactor, as well as intermediates of low toxicity, demonstrating that photo-Fenton process can be a viable alternative for caffeine removal in wastewater. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available