4.7 Article

In silico investigations of anti-androgen activity of polychlorinated biphenyls

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 92, Issue 7, Pages 795-802

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.022

Keywords

Polychlorinated biphenyls; Androgen receptor; 3D-QSAR; Molecular docking; Molecular dynamics simulations

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of PR China [20737001]
  2. Program for Environment Protection in Jiangsu Province [201140]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have attracted great concern as global environmental pollutants and representative endocrine disruptors. In this work, a molecular model study combining three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR), molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations was performed to explore the structural requirement for the anti-androgen activities of PCBs and to reveal the binding mode between the PCBs and androgen receptor (AR). The best comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) model, obtained from receptor-based alignment, shows leave-one-out cross-validated correlation coefficient (q(2)) of 0.665 and conventional correlation coefficient (R-2) of 0.945. The developed model has a highly predictive ability in both internal and external validation. Furthermore, the interaction mechanisms of PCBs to AR were analyzed by molecular docking and MD simulation. Molecular docking indicated that all the PCBs in the data set docked in a hydrophobic pocket. The Binding free energies calculated by Molecular mechanics-Poisson Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) not only exhibited a good correlation with the experimental activity, but also could explain the activity difference of the studied compounds. The binding free energy decomposition analysis indicates that the van der Waals interaction is the major driving force for the binding process. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available