4.7 Article

Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) pollution as a potential risk factor for developing vascular dementia and its synaptic mechanisms

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages 52-58

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.02.061

Keywords

Nitrogen dioxide (NO2); Vascular dementia (VaD); Cognitive function; Synaptic plasticity

Funding

  1. Graduate Student Innovation Program of Shanxi [20103018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent epidemiological literatures reported that NO2 is a potential risk factor of ischemic stroke in polluted area. Meanwhile, our previous in vivo study found that NO2 could delay the recovery of nerve function after stroke, implying a possible risk of vascular dementia (VaD) with NO2 inhalation, which is often a common cognitive complication resulting from stroke. However, the effect and detailed mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. In the present study, synaptic mechanisms, the foundation of neuronal function and viability, were investigated in both model rats of ischemic stroke and healthy rats after NO2 exposure. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) observation showed that 5 mg m(-3) NO2 exposure not only exacerbated the ultrastructural impairment of synapses in stroke model rats, but also induced neuronal damage in healthy rats. Meantime, we found that the expression of synaptophysin (SYP) and postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD-95), two structural markers of synapses in ischemic stroke model were inhibited by NO2 inhalation; and so it was with the key proteins mediating long-term potentiation (LTP), the major form of synaptic plasticity. On the contrary, NO2 inhalation induced the expression of nearly all these proteins in healthy rats in a concentration-dependent manner. Our results implied that NO2 exposure could increase the risk of VaD through inducing excitotoxicity in healthy rats but weakening synaptic plasticity directly in stroke model rats. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available