4.7 Review

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in relation to secondary sex ratio A systematic review of published studies

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages 131-138

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.019

Keywords

Polychlorinated biphenyls; Secondary sex ratio; Reproductive effects; Health outcomes; Environmental exposure

Funding

  1. European Community [226534-ArcRisk]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is reasonably strong evidence linking reduced secondary sex ratio (proportion of males) and environmental exposures. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are persistent contaminants of the environment and several studies have reported an association of PCBs with birth outcomes. A decrease in the male/female sex ratio at birth has been reported in some, but not all studies. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize and pool the research findings about the influence of PCBs on sex ratio. Several article databases and reference lists of identified articles were searched. Studies reporting the proportion of boys and girls born to individuals who were exposed to high PCB concentrations were included. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of males in groups exposed to high or low levels of PCBs. Studies with both direct and indirect surrogate PCB measurements were included, the search and selection resulted in 15 eligible studies on the association between the sex ratio and parental PCB exposures. Analyses of the high exposure groups showed that the sex ratio was not significantly altered from the historical reference range in 13 of the 15 articles. The majority of the exposure studies reported also internal. comparisons between high and low PCB exposure levels. The pooled 95% confidence interval estimate for the difference in high and low maternal exposure with direct PCB measure was - 0.048 with 95% Cl of (-0.121, 0.026). There was no strong or moderate indication that parental exposure to PCBs alters the sex ratio of the children. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available