4.2 Article

Relationship between polyunsaturated fatty acid levels in maternal diets and human milk in the first month post-partum

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 405-410

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12337

Keywords

Chinese women; dietary intake; human breast milk; north of China; polyunsaturated fatty acids; urban

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81102115]
  2. Nutrition Research Foundation of China Nutrition Society-DSM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe present study evaluated the relationship between dietary fatty acid (FA) intakes and human milk FA levels. MethodsHealthy lactating women (n = 514) from Northern China participated in the study. Dietary intake was assessed with a 24-h dietary recall questionnaire and evaluated using golden key maternal nutrition software (Wincome, Shanghai, China) and China Food Composition 2009. Human milk FA composition was determined by gas chromatography. ResultsThe maternal daily median intakes of linoleic acid (LA), -linolenic acid (ALA) and arachidonic acid (AA) were 19.93 g, 3.08 g and 16.33 mg, respectively. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) intakes were below the recommended levels. FA levels in 100 g of human milk were 0.363 g LA, 0.038 g -linolenic acid (GLA), 0.052 g dihomo -linolenic acid (DGLA), 0.144 g ALA, 0.079 g AA, 0.007 g EPA, 0.018 g docosatetraenoic acid (DTA) and 0.048 g DHA. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that human milk DGLA levels were negatively correlated with dietary LA intake ( = -0.223, P = 0.030), and human milk GLA and DTA levels were negatively correlated with dietary ALA intake ( = -2.189, P = 0.031; = -2.252, P = 0.027) after adjusting for possible confounding factors. ConclusionsThe results of the present study suggest the presence of competitive interactions between n-3 fatty acids (ALA) and n-6 fatty acids (GLA and DTA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available