4.7 Article

Determination of total organic halogen (TOX) in humic acids after microwave-induced combustion

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages 281-286

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.068

Keywords

Humic acids; Microwave-induced combustion; Total organic halogen; TOX; Ion chromatography; ICP-MS

Funding

  1. INCT-Bioanalitica/CNPq
  2. Fapergs
  3. Metrohm AG (Switzerland and partner in Brazil)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemically chlorinated organic matter as well as natural background humic acids contain significant amounts of organically bound halogens that must be determined for assessment of environmental pollution. In this work the use of ion chromatography (IC) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is proposed for the determination of total organic Cl, Br and I concentration in humic acids extracted from various forest soil horizons after a single digestion by microwave-induced combustion (MIC). Samples were pressed as pellets and combusted using 20 bar of oxygen and ammonium nitrate solution as igniter. Analytes were absorbed in diluted alkaline solution (50 mM (NH4)(2)CO3) and a reflux step was applied after combustion to improve analyte recoveries (5 min, microwave power of 1400 W). The accuracy was evaluated using certified reference materials (CRM) and spiked samples. Using MIC the agreement with CRM values and spike recoveries was higher than 97% for all analytes. As an advantage over conventional procedures, using MIC it was possible to digest up to eight samples in only 25 min, obtaining a single solution suitable for all halogens determination in humic acids samples by different techniques (IC and ICP-MS). The limit of detection (17) for Cl, Br and I obtained by IC was 1.2, 2.5 and 4.3 mu g g(-1) and by ICP-MS it was 1.4, 0.03 and 0.002 mu g g(-1). respectively. (c) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available