4.7 Article

Sulfate adsorption properties of acid-sensitive soils in the Athabasca oil sands region in Alberta, Canada

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages 457-463

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.03.034

Keywords

Sulfate adsorption; Acid deposition; Soil acidification; Oil sands; Langmuir; Freundlich

Funding

  1. NOx and SO2 Management Working Group (NSMWG)
  2. Cumulative Environmental Management Association (CEMA)
  3. Alberta Environment and the University of Alberta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The risk of soil acidification is high in the Athabasca oil sands region (AOSR) in Alberta. Canada, due to elevated SO2 emission and the resultant acid deposition to sensitive, coarse-textured soils. Understanding the sulfate adsorption characteristics of soils sensitive to acidification will help establish critical loads of acid deposition in AOSR. Sulfate adsorption properties were evaluated and relationships between sulfate adsorption and soil properties were examined for soils in two contrasting watersheds (NE7 and SM8) in AOSR. The experimental data fitted well to both the Langmuir and the Freundlich models. The sulfate adsorption capacity was greater for soils in SM8 than in NE7 (p < 0.01). even though it was relatively low in both watersheds as compared to other acid-sensitive soils in eastern North America. Based on the additional sulfate adsorbed when a soil was treated with 40 mL of 200 mg SO42- L-1 solution, the weakly developed Podzolic B horizon (136)in NE7 could adsorb more sulfate than the Ae horizon while no difference was found among other horizons. In SM8, the Bfj and illuviated B (Bt) horizons had greater ability to adsorb sulfate than the other horizons, likely caused by the presence of muscovite in the Bfj and Bt horizons. The additional sulfate adsorbed accounted for about 80% of the total sulfate adsorption capacity and was correlated with pH(NaF) (soil pH extracted with 1 MNaF) and Delta pH(NaF)(the difference between pH(NaF) and pH measured with deionized water), with the following relationships: sulfate adsorption (mg SO42- kg(-1)) = exp(2.03 pH(NaF) - 18.0) + 50.2 (R-2 = 0.63, p < 0.001) and sulfate adsorption (mg SO42- kg(-1)) = exp(1.83 Delta pH(NaF) - 6.57) + 48.9 (R-2 = 0.70, p < 0.001). The Delta pH(NaF) was likely a better indicator of the soil's sulfate adsorption capacity than pH(NaF) as the former excludes the effect of soil acidity. Our study indicates that the soil's capacity to adsorb sulfate should be considered in determining the critical load for acid deposition in AOSR in Alberta. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available