4.7 Article

Comparing the sensitivity of soil invertebrates to pesticides with that of Eisenia fetida

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages 1040-1047

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.032

Keywords

Environmental risk assessment; Soil invertebrates; Eisenia fetida; Relative tolerance; Terrestrial ecotoxicology

Funding

  1. Portuguese government [C2007-ISA/CEER/ECOTOX, SFRH/BD/42306/2007]
  2. HERBITOXBIOAS [PTDC/AMB/64230/2006]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/42306/2007] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sole routine testing of the standard earthworm Eisenia fetida for the terrestrial risk assessment of pesticides has been under much debate since other soil invertebrates may be more sensitive than this standard test species. However, the very low availability of laboratory toxicity data for taxa other than E. fetida has greatly hampered sensitivity comparisons. In the present study, the relative tolerance (T-rel) approach was used to enable comparing toxicity thresholds obtained from the US-EPA ECOTOX database, for main terrestrial taxonomic groups and pesticidal types of action (insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, and other) separately. Analyses confirmed previously reported lower and higher sensitivity of collembolans to fungicides and insecticides, respectively. However, various other discrepancies in susceptibility relative to E. fetida were encountered as indicated by species sensitivity distributions and/or calculated 95% confidence intervals of T-rel values. Arachnids and isopods were found to be more sensitive to insecticides, and nematodes to fungicides, as compared to E. fetida. Implications of study findings for the terrestrial risk assessment of pesticides are discussed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available