4.7 Article

Trends in soil sorption coefficients within common antimicrobial families

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 79, Issue 8, Pages 786-793

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.03.017

Keywords

Pharmaceuticals; Veterinary; Emerging contaminants; Fate; Empirical sorption models; Speciation

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [BES-0225696]
  2. US Department of Agriculture [2002-35107-12258]
  3. Center for Environmental Sciences and Engineering at the University of Connecticut

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sorption coefficients (K-d) of fluoroquinolone, tetracycline, and sulfonamide antimicrobial compounds were measured for seven soils between pH 4.5 and 8.5 using batch sorption techniques. Soils were chosen to encompass a range of cation exchange capacity (CEC), iron and aluminum oxide and organic matter contents. For most soil-pH pairs, enrofloxacin, norfloxacin, and ciprofloxacin K-d values were within a factor of 2 (0.3 log units) of each other. Lower enrofloxacin sorption than norfloxacin or ciprofloxacin sorption was observed at pH 8.5 for the two most aluminosilicate clay-rich soils, likely due to compound differences in acid dissociation constants, yielding greater anion species abundance for enrofloxacin. Tetracycline, oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline K-d values also were within a factor of 2 for each soil-pH pair. Measured tetracycline and fluoroquinolone compound K-d values could be estimated within a factor of 2 using published empirical multi-linear regression models. In contrast, sulfonamide K-d values varied among compounds, as expected for sorbates that interact primarily with soil organic matter. Results of this research indicate that substituent groups have little effect on sorption interactions of compounds from the tetracycline and fluoroquinolone family that interact with soils primarily through cation exchange, surface complexation and cation bridging sorption mechanisms. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available