4.7 Article

Sorption of naphthalene and 1-naphthol by biochars of orange peels with different pyrolytic temperatures

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages 127-133

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.004

Keywords

Biochar; Orange peels; Organic pollutant; Adsorption; Partition; Wastewater treatment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20577041, 40671168, 20737002]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-050525]
  3. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China [200765]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biochars, derived from biomass, are increasingly recognized as an environmental-friendly sorbent to abate organic pollutants. Sorption variations of biochars with their pyrolytic temperatures are evaluated. Nine biochars of orange peels with different pyrolytic temperatures (150-700 degrees C, referred as OP150-OP700) were characterized via elemental analysis, BET-N-2 surface area, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Sorption of naphthalene and 1-naphthol by the biochars in water are compared. Sorption isotherms varied from linear to Freundlich with increasing pyrolytic temperature. The respective contributions of adsorption and partition to total sorption were correlated with biochars' structural parameters. For OP150-OP600, sorption of 1-naphthol was significantly larger than naphthalene due to the former owning additional specific interactions. For I-naphthol with high concentrations, the OP200 exhibited the maximal sorption capacity due to its largest partition and high adsorption among nine biochars. For 1-naphthol with low concentrations and naphthalene, the OP700 displayed the maximal sorption capacity. These observations provide a reference to the use of biochars as engineered sorbents for environmental applications. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available