4.7 Article

Influence of fluorocarbon flat-membrane hydrophobicity on carbon dioxide recovery

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 75, Issue 10, Pages 1410-1416

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.027

Keywords

Carbon dioxide absorption; Piperazine; 2-Amino-2-methyl-1-propanol; Poly(vinylidene fluoride) membrane; Plasma treatment; Surface modification

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education (MOE), ROC
  2. Chung Yuan Christian University, Taiwan [CYCU-97-CR-CE]
  3. National Science Council (NSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of hydrophobicity in flat-plate porous poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) and expended polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes on CO(2) recovery using aqueous solutions of piperazine (PZ) and alkanolamine is examined. Experiments were conducted at various gas flow rates, liquid flow rates, and absorbent concentrations. The CO(2) absorption flux increased with increasing gas flow rates and absorbent concentrations. When using 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) or AMP + PZ aqueous solution as absorbent, this process was dominantly governed by gas film layer diffusion and membrane diffusion. The diffusion resistance of the membrane phase was only important when using N-methyldiethanolamine as the sole absorbent. The water contact angle increased initially with increasing plasma working power and reached at steady state value of 155 degrees beyond 100W. The elemental fluorine-to-carbon ratio (F/C) and water contact angle of the PVDF membrane increased with increasing treatment time and reached a plateau after 5 min of CH(4) plasma (100 W). Increases in the CO(2) absorption fluxes of 7% and 17% were observed for plasma-treated PVDF membranes in comparison to non-treated PVDF and PTFE, respectively, when using I M AMP as absorbent. The membrane mass transfer coefficient, k(m), for plasma-treated PVDF membranes increased from 2.1 x 10(-4) to 2.5 x 10-4 m s(-1). Membrane durability was greatly improved by CF(4) plasma treatment (100 W/5 min) and comparable to that of PTFE membranes. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available