4.7 Article

Persistent organic pollutants in two fish species of Percidae and sediment from the Sulejowski Reservoir in central Poland

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 75, Issue 9, Pages 1135-1143

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.03.001

Keywords

PCBs; PCDD/DFs; Pesticides; Pikeperch; Perch; BSAFs

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [2 P04G 088 30]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two predatory fish species, pikeperch and perch, and sediment from the Sulejowski Reservoir in Poland were analyzed for several classes of persistent organic pollutants. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCHs), hexachlorobenzene (HCB), heptachlor, and DDTs were measured in the fish muscles. In addition, the distribution and profile of PCBs in muscles, livers, and gonads was examined. In sediment, PCBs and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and furans (PCDFs) were analyzed. The main contaminant in the muscles of both species was p,p' - DDE reaching an average of 1072 and 694 ng g(-1) lipid in pikeperch and perch, respectively. Sigma PCBs, with an average concentration of 454 and 261 ng g(-1) lipid, respectively, were the second dominant contaminants. The two species differed in their PCB congener profile as a result of differences in feeding habits. Sediment PCDD/F concentrations ranged from 10.8 to 162.7 pg g(-1) dry mass, TEQ(PCDD/FS) from 1.13 to 4.13 pg g(-1) dry mass, and the sum of indicator PCBs (Sigma PCB7) from 2.8 to 5.2 ng g(-1) dry mass. Biota - sediment accumulation factors (BSAFs) for Sigma PCB7 were generally greater in pikeperch than in perch as a result of greater lipid content in the latter. Based on the contaminant levels in the sediment and fish, the Sulejowski Reservoir compares well with other, freshwater environments relatively uncontaminated with persistent organic pollutants. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available