4.7 Article

Estimation of amorphous organic carbon/water partition coefficients, subcooled liquid aqueous solubilities, and n-octanol/water partition coefficients of nonpolar chlorinated aromatic compounds from chlorine fragment constants

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 74, Issue 8, Pages 1024-1030

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.002

Keywords

Absorption; Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxines; Polychlorinated dibenzofurans; Chlorobenzenes; Polychlorinated biphenyls

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to derive the relation between the number of chlorine atoms in chlorobenzenes, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), and dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and logK(oc) for linear partitioning between water and average amorphous organic carbon in soils or sediments. Because reliable determinations of logK(oc) are relatively sparse for chlorobenzenes and PCBs, and are even absent for PCDDs and PCDFs, a work-around solution was developed: First, the relation of n-octanol/water partitioning (K-ow) and (subcooled) liquid solubility (S-l) to the number of chlorines was investigated. Slopes for the linear correlation of logK(ow) with the number of chlorines (corrected for the number of ortho-chlorines in the case of PCBs) appeared identical for chlorobenzenes, PCBs, PCDDs, and PCDFs. Such was also the case for logS(l). Slopes for the linear relation of chlorobenzenes and PCB logK(oc) values with the number of chlorines were similar for the various soils and sediments, though intercepts were different. The ortho-chlorine correction factor for PCB logK(oc) was equal to the ortho-chlorine correction factor for PCB logK(ow) and logS(l). For PCDDs and PCDFs, a relation between logK(oc) and the number of chlorine atoms was derived by combining the chlorobenzenes/PCB logK(oc) - logK(ow) and logK(oc) - logS(l) relationships with logK(ow) (or S-l)-chlorine number relations for PCDDs and PCDFs. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available