4.7 Article

Short-term exposure to dioxin impairs bone tissue in male rats

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 75, Issue 5, Pages 680-684

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.12.024

Keywords

Rodents; TCDD; PINP; Mineralization; Bone toxicity; AhR (Ah receptor)

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning [216-2006-1306, 210/2003-1161]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic and sub-chronic studies in rats have previously shown that dioxin-like compounds impair the bone tissue homeostasis. In the present study, tibiae and serum were analyzed to study possible effects of short term dioxin exposure on rats. Two month old (ca. 200 g) male rats were injected with 50 mu g 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) kg(-1) bw and tibiae were excised 5 d following the exposure. Bone composition, dimensions and strength were analyzed by pQCT and three-point bending test on tibiae. In addition, detailed bone composition was analyzed by optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR). Analysis of the serum bone biomarkers procollagen type-I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and carboxyterminal cross linking teleopeptide (CTX) were also performed. pQCT-results showed alterations in the metaphysis, with a significant decrease in trabecular bone cross-sectional area (-19%, p<0.05) and a significant increase in total bone mineral density (+7%, p < 0.05) in TCDD-exposed rats. Analyses of the bones by ICP-OES and FTIR showed that bones from exposed rats had a higher relative proportion of crystalline phosphate (+13% for a1080 and +11% for a] 113, p < 0.05) and lower acid phosphate content (-22% for a] 145, p < 0.05), resembling the composition of more mature bones. Serum analysis showed that the bone formation marker PINP was decreased (-37%, p < 0.05) and that the bone resorption marker CTX was increased (+14%, p < 0.05) indicating a net loss of bone tissue. In conclusion, 5 d of exposure to TCDD was sufficient to negatively affect bone tissue in male rats. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available