4.4 Review

Revisited HLA and non-HLA genetics of Takayasu arteritis-where are we?

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 27-32

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2015.87

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is an immune-mediated vasculitis affecting large arteries first reported in 1908 from Japan. Case reports of familial onset of TAK from Japan and other countries indicated genetic contribution to TAK onset beyond ethnicity. Genetic studies of TAK have been performed mainly addressing the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) locus. HLA genetic studies of TAK that have previously been reported are reviewed in this manuscript. HLA-B*52:01 is associated with TAK beyond population. Many of the associations other than HLA-B*52:01 can be explained by a haplotype with HLA-B*52:01. HLA-B*67:01 is a novel susceptibility HLA-B allele to TAK confirmed in the Japanese population. Further independent associations are suggested in the HLA locus. Involvement of the 171st and 67th amino acid residues with TAK onset has been indicated. The 67th amino acid may explain the difference in susceptibility effects to TAK and Behcet's disease between HLA-B*52:01 and *51:01. HLAB*52:01 is associated not only with TAK susceptibility but also with clinical phenotypes. Recent genome-wide association studies of TAK revealed multiple non-HLA susceptibility genes. In particular, the IL12B region seems to have a central role in TAK onset and its progression. Whether TAK and giant cell arteritis (GCA), the other vasculitis affecting large arteries, are the same disease is an interesting question to address in spite of different clinical manifestations between the two diseases. GCA is associated with HLA-DR4, which is not associated with TAK. GCA is not associated with HLA-Bw52. These two diseases seem not to share non-HLA susceptibility loci based on the recent genetic studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available