4.7 Article

A practical comparison of single and multiple imputation methods to handle complex missing data in air quality datasets

Journal

CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages 23-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2014.02.007

Keywords

Missing data; Single imputation; Expectation-maximization; Multiple imputation; Air quality

Funding

  1. European Union (FEDER) [UNLC00-23-003]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Research Grant) [CGL2010-18145]
  3. Galician Government [10MSD164019PR, 2010/52]
  4. Xunta of Galicia by an I2C (Type B) postdoctoral Grant
  5. EU-FEDER program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Datasets with missing data ratios ranging from 24% to 4%, corresponding to three air quality monitoring studies, were used to ascertain whether major differences occur when five currently used imputation methods are applied (four single imputation methods and a multiple imputation one). Unrotated and Varimax-rotated factor analyses performed on the imputed datasets were compared. All methods performed similarly, although multiple imputation yielded more disperse imputed values. Main differences occurred when a variable with missing values correlated poorly to the other features and when a variable had relevant loadings in several unrotated factors, which sometimes changed the order of the rotated factors. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available