4.7 Article

Chromatographic profiling and multivariate analysis for screening and quantifying the contributions from individual components to the bioactive signature in natural products

Journal

CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS
Volume 107, Issue 1, Pages 98-105

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.02.002

Keywords

Bioactivity; Natural products; Herbal medicine; Multivariate regression; Target projection; Variable selection

Funding

  1. University Grant Committee [AoE/B-10-01]
  2. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong [BB8H, BB6R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new approach for assigning bioactivity to individual components in extracts from natural products is presented and validated. 60 mixtures were created according to a uniform design from 12 chemical components of which 7 possessed antioxidant activity. The synthetic mixtures were characterized by chromatographic profiling and their antioxidant power was assessed by use of the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) assay. 40 of the prepared mixtures were used as a training set to create a cross validated partial least squares (PLS) regression model with the FRAP measurement as response. The remaining 20 mixtures were used as an independent external validation set. The bioactive signature was singled out from the multi-component PLS model using target projection (TP). In addition to excellent prediction performance of antioxidant strength from the bioactive signature, our approach, called Quantitative Pattern-Activity Relationship (QPAR), was able to rank 6 of the 7 bioactive components according to individual bioactive strength. The ratios of bioactive capacity of the two most active components to the two least active components were close to 100 to 1. This explains why one of the two least bioactive components was not detected. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available