4.7 Article

Multiple regression systems for spectrophotometric data analysis

Journal

CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages 144-149

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2008.10.001

Keywords

Chemical component concentration estimation; Data fusion; Multiple regression systems; Radial basis function neural networks; Spectrophotometric variable selection; Spectrophotometry

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we propose a novel approach for the estimation of the concentration of chemical components through spectrophotometric measurements. It is based on the exploitation of the whole spectral information available in the original spectral data space by means of a Multiple Regression System (MRS) whose design is performed in three successive steps. The first one aims at a simple partitioning of the original spectral data space into subspaces of reduced dimensionality. The second step consists in training a (linear or nonlinear) regression method in each of the subspaces obtained in the previous step. In the third and final step, the estimates provided by the ensemble of regressors are combined in order to produce a global estimate of the concentration of the chemical component of interest. For this purpose, two linear and one nonlinear combination strategies are explored. The experimental assessment of the MRS was carried out on two different datasets: 1) a wine dataset for the determination of alcohol concentration by mid-infrared spectroscopy; and 2) an orange juice dataset where near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy is used to estimate the saccharose concentration. The obtained results suggest that the proposed MRS approach represents a promising alternative to the traditional regression methods. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available