4.5 Article

From Activity Cliffs to Target-Specific Scoring Models and Pharmacophore Hypotheses

Journal

CHEMMEDCHEM
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages 1630-1639

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.201100179

Keywords

activity cliffs; protein-ligand interactions; QSAR; structure-based pharmacophore elucidation; target-specific scoring

Funding

  1. NV Organon part of MSD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of activity cliffs in drug discovery projects is certainly two-edged: on the one hand, they often lead to the failure of QSAR modeling techniques; on the other, they are highly valuable for identifying key aspects of SARs. In the presence of activity cliffs the results of purely ligand-based QSAR approaches often remain puzzling, and the resulting models have limited predictive power. Herein we present a new approach for the identification of structure-based activity cliffs (ISAC). It uses the valuable information of activity cliffs in a structure-based design scenario by analyzing interaction energies of protein-ligand complexes. Using the relative frequency at which a protein atom is involved in activity cliff events, we introduce a novel visualization of hot spots in the active site of a protein. The ISAC approach supports the medicinal chemist in elucidating the key interacting atoms of the binding site and facilitates the development of pharmacophore hypotheses. The hot spot visualization can be applied to small data sets in early project phases as well as in the lead optimization process. Based on the ISAC approach, we developed a method to derive target-specific scoring functions and pharmacophore constraints, which were validated on independent external data sets in virtual screening experiments. The activity-cliff-based approach shows an improved enrichment over the generic empirical scoring function for various protein targets in the validation set.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available