4.6 Article

Recyclable Porous Polymer-Supported Copper Catalysts for Glaser and Huisgen 1,3-Diolar Cycloaddition Reactions

Journal

CHEMISTRY-AN ASIAN JOURNAL
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages 2822-2827

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asia.201300690

Keywords

copper; Glaser coupling; heterogeneous catalysis; Huisgen 1; 3-dipolar cycloaddition; phenanthroline ligand; polymers

Funding

  1. NSFC [U1162201, 21003107]
  2. National High-Tech Research and Development program of China [2013AA065301]
  3. Science and Technology Innovative Team of Zhejiang Province [2012R10014-01]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013XZZX001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A family of polymer-attached phenanthrolines was prepared from solvothermal copolymerization of divinylbenzene with N-(1,10-phenanthroline-5-yl)acrylamide in different ratios. The polymer-supported copper catalysts were obtained through typical impregnation with copper(II) salts. The polymers and supported copper catalysts have been characterized by N-2 adsortion, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and thermogravimetric analysis (TG); they exhibit a high surface area, hierarchical porosity, large pore volume, and high thermal and chemical stabilities. The copper catalyst has proved to be highly active for Glaser homocoupling of alkynes and Huisgen 1,3-diolar cycloaddition of alkynes with benzyl azide under mild conditions at low catalyst loading. The heterogeneous copper catalyst is more active than commonly used homogeneous and nonporous polystyrene-supported copper catalysts. In particular, the catalyst is easily recovered and can be recycled at least ten times without any obvious loss in catalytic activity. Metal leaching was prevented due to the strong binding ability of phenanthroline and products were not contaminated with copper, as determined by ICP analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available