4.3 Article

Effect of nitric oxide on dormancy release in bulbs of Oriental lily (Lilium orientalis) 'Siberia'

Journal

JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages 594-598

Publisher

HEADLEY BROTHERS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2015.11668720

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of P. R. China [31160398, 31560563]
  2. Post-Doctoral Foundation of P. R. China [20100470887, 2012T50828]
  3. Key Project of the Chinese Ministry of Education [211182]
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20116202120005]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, P.R. China [1308RJZA179]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for Universities in Gansu, P. R. China
  7. Scientific And Technological Project of Lanzhou City, P. R. China [2011129]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitric oxide (NO) is an essential endogenous plant signalling molecule involved in a wide range of plant developmental processes. To investigate the effect of NO on breaking dormancy in bulbs, bulbs of Oriental lily (Lilium orientalis) 'Siberia' were treated with various concentration of the NO donor, sodium nitroprusside (SNP; 0.0, 1.0, 3.0, or 5.0 mM). The results showed that the effect of NO was dose-dependent, with the maximum biological response at 1.0 mM SNP. When applied exogenously, the 1.0 mM SNP treatment reduced the time required to release dormancy in Oriental lily bulbs. Meanwhile, 1.0 mM SNP significantly increased the shoot length: bulb height ratio. In addition, 1.0 mM SNP significantly lowered starch concentrations and increased water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and reducing sugar concentrations. These results indicate that NO treatment, at the correct dose, reduced the time required to release dormancy in bulbs by accelerating the degradation of starch and increasing the accumulation of WSC and reducing sugars in Oriental lily bulbs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available