3.9 Article

The potential in breast tissue engineering for the combined effects of linoleic acid and tamoxifen

Journal

JOURNAL OF HISTOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 39-44

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/2046023614Y.0000000052

Keywords

Arachidonic acid; Eicosanoid; Linoleic acid; Polyunsaturated fatty acids; Tamoxifen

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Emerging Frontiers in Research Innovation [CBE0736007]
  2. Department of Defense Era of Hope Scholar Award [BC044778]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Literature to date has strongly suggested that linoleic acid (LA) enhances mammary cancer cell proliferation when used in the range of 0.5-20 mu g/ml. In contrast, the current in vitro studies show that deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) levels of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) MCF7 breast cancer cells were diminished following treatment with 30 mu g/ml (100 mu M) LA. MCF7 cells, when treated for 6 days with LA, consumed significantly less glucose than untreated controls (P-value < 0.01). MFC7 cells treated with 30 mu g/ml LA and 10 mM tamoxifen had even lower levels of DNA and lower glucose uptake. The same combination treatment of tamoxifen and LA was applied to a noncancerous mammary cell line, MCF10A, and did not have a significant effect on MCF10A DNA concentrations. Linoleic acid and its byproducts are important to cell proliferation and tissue reconstruction and, in combination with tamoxifen, can provide a uniquely different approach to soft tissue engineering. That is, LA and tamoxifen-loaded scaffolds may provide a viable reconstructive approach for patients undergoing lumpectomy and mastectomy by encouraging natural breast healing while limiting the ability of ER+ cancer cells to regrow. This approach could allow the suppression of estrogen-dependent mammary carcinomas while allowing natural cell proliferation after a mastectomy or lumpectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available