4.6 Article

Batch versus Flow Photochemistry: A Revealing Comparison of Yield and Productivity

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 20, Issue 46, Pages 15226-15232

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201404347

Keywords

batch reactors; cycloaddition; flow photochemistry; rearrangement; scale-up

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. EPSRC [EP/K006053/1, EP/L003325/1]
  3. University of Bristol
  4. EPSRC Bristol Chemical Synthesis Doctoral Training Centre [EP/G036764/1]
  5. AstraZeneca
  6. Syngenta
  7. EPSRC [EP/L003325/1, EP/K006053/1, EP/K03927X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1654052, GR/S25593/01, EP/L003325/1, EP/K006053/1, EP/K03927X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of flow photochemistry and its apparent superiority over batch has been reported by a number of groups in recent years. To rigorously determine whether flow does indeed have an advantage over batch, a broad range of synthetic photochemical transformations were optimized in both reactor modes and their yields and productivities compared. Surprisingly, yields were essentially identical in all comparative cases. Even more revealing was the observation that the productivity of flow reactors varied very little to that of their batch counterparts when the key reaction parameters were matched. Those with a single layer of fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) had an average productivity 20% lower than that of batch, whereas three-layer reactors were 20% more productive. Finally, the utility of flow chemistry was demonstrated in the scale-up of the ring-opening reaction of a potentially explosive [1.1.1] propellane with butane-2,3-dione.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available