4.6 Article

Blending Gelators to Tune Gel Structure and Probe Anion-Induced Disassembly

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 279-291

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201303153

Keywords

blend; co-gels; fluorescence; orthogonal self-assembly; supramolecular chemistry

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  2. Durham University
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F063229/1, EP/E023339/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/E023339/1, EP/F063229/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blending different low molecular weight gelators (LMWGs) provides a convenient route to tune the properties of a gel and incorporate functionalities such as fluorescence. Blending a series of gelators having a common bis-urea motif, and functionalised with different amino acid-derived end-groups and differing length alkylene spacers is reported. Fluorescent gelators incorporating 1- and 2-pyrenyl moieties provide a probe of the mixed systems alongside structural and morphological data from powder diffraction and electron microscopy. Characterisation of the individual gelators reveals that although the expected -urea tape motif is preserved, there is considerable variation in the gelation properties, molecular packing, fibre morphology and rheological behaviour. Mixing of the gelators revealed examples in which: 1)the gels formed separate, orthogonal networks maintaining their own packing and morphology, 2)the gels blended together into a single network, either adopting the packing and morphology of one gelator, or 3)a new structure not seen for either of the gelators individually was created. The strong binding of the urea functionalities to anions was exploited as a means of breaking down the gel structure, and the use of fluorescent gel blends provides new insights into anion-mediated gel dissolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available