4.6 Article

Are β-H Eliminations or Alkene Insertions Feasible Elementary Steps in Catalytic Cycles Involving Gold(I) Alkyl Species or Gold(I) Hydrides?

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages 3954-3961

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201203043

Keywords

alkenes; computational chemistry; elimination; gold; hydrides; insertion

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Sonderforschungsbereich 623]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The -H-elimination in the (iPr)AuEt complex and its microscopic reverse, the insertion of ethene into (iPr)AuH, were investigated in a combined experimental and computational study. Our DFT-D3 calculations predict free-energy barriers of 49.7 and 36.4kcalmol1 for the elimination and insertion process, respectively, which permit an estimation of the rate constants for these reactions according to classical transition-state theory. The elimination/insertion pathway is found to involve a high-energy ethene hydride species and is not significantly affected by continuum solvent effects. The high barriers found in the theoretical study were then confirmed experimentally by measuring decomposition temperatures for several different (iPr)AuIalkyl complexes which, with a slow decomposition at 180 degrees C, are significantly higher than those of other transition-metal alkyl complexes. In addition, at the same temperature, the decomposition of (iPr)AuPh and (iPr)AuMe, both of which cannot undergo -H-elimination, indicates that the pathway for the observed decomposition at 180 degrees C is not a -H-elimination. According to the calculations, the latter should not occur at temperatures below 200 degrees C. The microscopic reverse of the -H-elimination, the insertion of ethene into the (iPr)AuH could neither be observed at pressures up to 8bar at RT nor at 1bar at 80 degrees C. The same is true for the strain-activated norbornene.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available