Journal
CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 18, Issue 15, Pages 4470-4479Publisher
WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201102687
Keywords
chemical bonding; chemical concepts; computational chemistry; nucleophilic substitution; steric hindrance
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Quantum chemical investigations in the literature sometimes underpin traditional chemical concepts (such as those of different primary and secondary types of chemical bonding or of steric repulsions) but sometimes also seem to undermine them. Conceptual pitfalls in recent discussions in this and other leading journals, when combining empirically and quantum chemically based reasoning, can be avoided when taking four points into account: 1) The construction of theoretical concepts should be guided by both, physical rigor and the aim of recovering the notions that have been found chemically fruitful. 2) Partitioning of a chemical phenomenon into elementary physical steps should not only consider the stationary initial and final states but also include non-stationary intermediate states that exhibit the physically characteristic internal relaxation mechanism. 3) Even if sufficiently accurate, the partitioning into large contributions of opposite sign is less valuable for a qualitative chemical understanding, as long as the trend of one big decisive term or sum of terms cannot be made obvious (for instance on the basis of the variation principleor by chemical intuition). 4) Causal explanatory notions, even if more vague or fuzzy than some more rigorous and unique descriptive concepts, have to be advanced towards a more fruitful chemical theory.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available