4.6 Article

Charge-Neutral Amidinate-Containing Iridium Complexes Capable of Efficient Photocatalytic Water Reduction

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 1303-1310

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201203029

Keywords

hydrogen; iridium; photochemistry; photosensitizer; water splitting

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [20901038]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB632400]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [1106021342, 1117021302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two new charge-neutral iridium complexes, [Ir(tfm-ppy)2(N,N'-diisopropyl-benzamidinate)] (1) and [Ir(tfm-ppy)2(N,N'-diisopropyl-4-diethylamino-3,5-dimethyl-benzamidinate)] (2) (tfm-ppy=4-trifluoromethyl-2-phenylpyridine) containing an amidinate ligand and two phenylpyridine ligands were designed and characterised. The photophysical properties, electrochemical behaviours and emission quenching properties of these species were investigated. In concert with the cobalt catalyst [Co(bpy)3]2+, members of this new class of iridium complexes enable the photocatalytic generation of hydrogen from mixed aqueous solutions via an oxidative quenching pathway and display long-term photostability under constant illumination over 72 h; one of these species achieved a relatively high turnover number of 1880 during this time period. In the case of complex 1, the three-component homogeneous photocatalytic system proved to be more efficient than a related system containing a charged complex, [Ir(tfm-ppy)2(dtb-bpy)]+ (3, dtb-bpy=4,4'-di-tert-butyl-2,2'-dipyridyl). In combination with a rhodium complex as a water reduction catalyst, the performances of the systems using both complexes were also evaluated, and these systems exhibited a more efficient catalytic propensity for water splitting than did the cobalt-based systems that have been studied previously.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available