4.6 Article

Synthesis, Characterisation and Application of Iridium(III) Photosensitisers for Catalytic Water Reduction

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 17, Issue 25, Pages 6998-7006

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201100235

Keywords

hydrogen; iridium; iron; photochemistry; photosensitizers; water splitting

Funding

  1. Evonik Degussa GmbH
  2. State of North Rhine-Westphalia
  3. European Union
  4. BMBF (Spitzenforschung und Innovation in den neuen Landern)
  5. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (FCI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The synthesis of novel, monocationic iridium(III) photosensitisers (Ir-PSs) with the general formula [Ir-III (C boolean AND N)(2)(N boolean AND N)](+) (C boolean AND N: cyclometal-lating phenylpyridine ligand, N boolean AND N: neutral bidentate ligand) is described. The structures obtained were examined by cyclic voltammetry, UV/Vis and photoluminescence spectroscopy and X-ray analysis. All iridium complexes were tested for their ability as photosensitisers to promote homogeneously catalysed hydrogen generation from water. In the presence of [HNEt3][HFe3(CO)(11)] as a water-reduction catalyst (WRC) and triethylamine as a sacrificial reductant (SR), seven of the new iridium complexes showed activity. [Ir(6-iPr-bpy)(ppy)(2)]PF6 (bpy: 2,2'-bipyridine, ppy: 2-phenylpyridine) turned out to be the most efficient photosensitiser. This complex was also tested in combination with other WRCs based on rhodium, platinum, cobalt and manganese. In all cases, significant hydrogen evolution took place. Maximum turnover numbers of 4550 for this Ir-PS and 2770 for the Fe WRC generated in situ from [HNEt3][HFe3(CO)(11)] and tris[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl) phenyl]phosphine was obtained. These are the highest overall efficiencies for any Ir/Fe water-reduction system reported to date. The incident photon to hydrogen yield reaches 16.4% with the best system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available