4.6 Article

Towards a Molecular Understanding of Cation-Anion Interactions-Probing the Electronic Structure of Imidazolium Ionic Liquids by NMR Spectroscopy, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Theoretical Calculations

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 16, Issue 30, Pages 9018-9033

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201001032

Keywords

charge transfer; density functional calculations; electronic interactions; ionic liquids; NMR spectroscopy; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Funding

  1. German Science Foundation (DFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ten [C(8)C(1)Im](+) (1-methyl-3-octylimidazolium)-based ionic liquids with anions Cl-, Br-, I-, [NO3](-), [BE4](-), [TfO](-), [PF6](-), [Tf2N](-), [Pf(2)N](-), and [FAP](-) (TfO=trifluoromethylsulfonate, Tf2N=bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, Pf(2)N=bis(pentafluoroethylsulfonyl)imide, FAP=tris-(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate) and two [C(8)C(1)C(1)Im](+) (1,2-dimethyl-3-octylimidazolium)-based ionic liquids with anions Br- and [Tf2N](-) were investigated by using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), NMR spectroscopy and theoretical calculations. While H-1 NMR spectroscopy is found to probe very specifically the strongest hydrogen-bond interaction between the hydrogen attached to the C-2 position and the anion, a comparative X.PS study provides first direct experimental evidence for cation-anion charge-transfer phenomena in ionic liquids as a function of the ionic liquid's anion. These charge-transfer effects are found to be surprisingly similar for [C(8)C(1)Im](+) and [C(8)C(1)C(1)Im](+) salts of the same anion, which in combination with theoretical calculations leads to the conclusion that hydrogen bonding and charge transfer occur independently from each other, but are both more pronounced for small and more strongly coordinating anions, and are greatly reduced in the case of large and weakly coordinating anions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available