4.6 Article

Exploring Group 14 Structures: 1D to 2D to 3D

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 16, Issue 22, Pages 6555-6566

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200903128

Keywords

coordination modes; density functional calculations; dimensionality; Group 14 elements; molecular dynamics

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-0613306, CHE-0910623]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various one-, two- and three-dimensional Group 14 (C, Si, Ge, Sn, and Pb) element structures at P = 1 atm are studied in this work. As expected, coordination number (CN)-not an unambiguous concept for extended structures-plays an important part in the stability of structures. Carbon not only favors four-coordination, but also is quite happy with pi-bonding, allowing three- and even two-coordination to compete. Highly coordinated (CN > 4) discrete carbon molecules are rare; that saturation of valence is reflected in the instability of C extended structures with CN > 4. Si and Ge are quite similar to each other in their preferences. They are less biased in their coordination than C, allowing (as their molecular structures do) CN = 5 and 6, but tending towards four-coordination. Sn and Pb 3D structures are very flexible in their bonding, so that in these elements four- to twelve-coordinate structures are close in energy. This lack of discrimination among ordered structures also points to an approach to the liquid state, consistent with the low melting point of Sn and Pb. The Group 14 liquid structures we simulate in molecular dynamics calculations show the expected, effective, first coordination number increase from 5.1 for Si to 10.4 for Pb. A special point of interest emerging from our study is the instability of potential multilayer graphene structures down Group 14. Only for C will these be stable; for all the other Group 14 elements pristine, unprotected, bi- and multilayer graphenes should collapse, forming vertical bonds as short as the in-plane ones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available