4.6 Article

Divalent carbon(0) chemistry, part 2: Protonation and complexes with main group and transition metal lewis acids

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 3273-3289

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200701392

Keywords

bonding analysis; carbon; density functional calculations; donor-acceptor systems; protonation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantum-chemical calculations with DFT (BP86) and ab initio methods (MP2, SCS-MP2) were carried out for protonated and diprotonated compounds N-H+ and N-(H+)(2) and for the complexes N-BH3, N-(BH3)(2), NCO2, N-(CO2)(2), N-W(CO)(5), N-Ni(CO)(3) and N-Ni(CO)(2) where N = C(PH3)(2) (1), C(PMe3)(2) (2), C(PPh3)(2) (3), C(PPh3)(CO) (4), C(CO)(2) (5), C(NHCH)(2) (6), C(NHCMe)(2) (7) (Me2N)(2)C = C = C(NMe2)(2) (8) and NHC (9) (NHCH=N-heterocyclic carbene, NHCMe=N-substituted N-heterocyclic carbene). Compounds 1-4 and 6-9 are very strong electron donors, and this is manifested in calculated protonation energies that reach values of up to 300 k cal mol(-1) for 7 and in very high bond strengths of the donor-acceptor complexes. The electronic structure of the compounds was analyzed with charge- and energy-partitioning methods. The calculations show that the experimentally known compounds 2-5 and 8 chemically behave like molecules L2C which have two L-C donor-acceptor bonds and a carbon atom with two electron lone pairs. The behavior is not directly obvious when the linear structures of carbon suboxide and tetraaminoallenes are considered. They only come to the fore on reaction with strong electron-pair acceptors. The calculations predict that single and double protonation of 5 and 8 take place at the central carbon atom, where the negative charge increases upon subsequent protonation. The hitherto experimentally unknown carbodicarbenes 6 and 7 are predicted to be even stronger Lewis bases than the carbodiphosphoranes 1-3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available