4.8 Article

Consequences of Optimal Bond Valence on Structural Rigidity and Improved Luminescence Properties in SrxBa2-xSiO4:Eu2+ Orthosilicate Phosphors

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages 2275-2282

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm500116u

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ConvEne IGERT Program [NSF-DGE 0801627]
  2. NSERC Postgraduate Scholarship
  3. International Fulbright Science & Technology Award
  4. MRSEC Program of the NSF [DMR 1121053]
  5. UCSB Center for Scientific Computing [NSF DMR-1121053, NSF CNS-0960316]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The orthosilicate phosphors SrxBa2-xSiO4:Eu2+ have now been known for over four decades and have found extensive recent use in solid-state white lighting. It is well-recognized in the literature and in practice that intermediate compositions in the solid-solutions between the orthosilicates Sr2SiO4 and Ba2SiO4 yield the best phosphor hosts when the thermal stability of luminescence is considered. We employ a combination of synchrotron X-ray diffraction, total scattering measurements, density functional theory calculations, and low-temperature heat capacity measurements, in conjunction with detailed temperature- and time-resolved studies of luminescence properties to understand the origins of the improved luminescence properties. We observe that in the intermediate compositions, the two cation sites in the crystal structure are optimally bonded as determined from bond valence sum calculations. Optimal bonding results in a more rigid lattice, as established by the intermediate compositions possessing the highest Debye temperature, which are determined experimentally from low-temperature heat capacity measurements. Greater rigidity in turn results in the highest luminescence efficiency for intermediate compositions at elevated temperatures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available