4.8 Article

Electrodeposition of Crystalline Co3O4-A Catalyst for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 24, Issue 18, Pages 3567-3573

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm3012205

Keywords

water electrolysis; oxygen evolution catalyst; cobalt oxide; Co3O4; electrodeposition

Funding

  1. U.S. Department Of Energy, Office of Basic Sciences [DE-FG02-08ER46518]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-08ER46518] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crystalline films of Co3O4 are deposited by electrochemically oxidizing a tartrate complex of Co2+ in an aqueous, alkaline solution at elevated temperatures. The crystallinity and stability of the films are a strong function of the deposition temperature. Films deposited at temperatures from 50 to 90 degrees C are amorphous, but films deposited from refluxing solution at 103 degrees C are crystalline. The crystalline films adhere strongly to the substrate, whereas the amorphous films peel off of the substrate when dried due to drying stresses. The crystalline films deposit with the normal spinel structure, with a lattice parameter of 0.8097 nm and crystallite size of 26 nm. The catalytic activity of Co3O4 for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) of the crystalline and amorphous films is compared by Tafel analysis in alkaline solution at pH 14. The crystalline Co3O4 film has a Tafel slope of 49 mV/decade and an exchange current density of 2.0 X 10(-1) A cm(-2), whereas an amorphous film deposited at 50 degrees C has a Tafel slope of 36 mV/decade and an exchange current density of 5.4 x 10(-12) A cm(-2). Because the films deposited from refluxing electrolyte deposit directly as crystalline films, it is possible to deposit them epitaxially on single-crystal Au(100). This opens up the possibility to study the catalytic activity of different Co3O4 planes exposed to the electrolyte.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available