4.8 Article

Cascade Organic Solar Cells

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages 4132-4140

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm200525h

Keywords

organic solar cells; photovoltaics; excitation transfer; energy cascade; open circuit voltage; polaron pair; charge transfer state

Funding

  1. Global Photonic Energy Corporation
  2. Center for Advanced Molecular Photovoltaics (CAMP) of the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUS-C1-015-21]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrate planar organic solar cells consisting of a series of complementary donor materials with cascading exciton energies, incorporated in the following structure: glass/indium-tin-oxide/donor cascade/C-60/bathocuproine/Al. Using a tetracene layer grown in a descending energy cascade on 5,6-diphenyl-tetracene and capped with 5,6,11,12-tetraphenyl-tetracene, where the accessibility of the pi-system in each material is expected to influence the rate of parasitic carrier leakage and charge recombination at the donor/acceptor interface, we observe an increase in open circuit voltage (v(oc)) of approximately 40% (corresponding to a change of +200 mV) compared to that of a single tetracene donor. Little change is observed in other parameters such as fill factor and short circuit current density (FF = 0.50 +/- 0.02 and J(sc) = 2.55 +/- 0.23 mA/cm(2)) compared to those of the control tetracene-C-60 solar cells (FP = 0.54 +/- 0.02 and J(sc) = 2.86 +/- 0.23 mA/cm(2)). We demonstrate that this cascade architecture is effective in reducing losses due to polaron pair recombination at donor acceptor interfaces, while enhancing spectral coverage, resulting in a substantial increase in the power conversion efficiency for cascade organic photovoltaic cells compared to tetracene and pentacene based devices with a single donor layer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available