4.8 Article

Tailored Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials: Anatase Nanoparticles and Brookite Nanorods as Highly Active Photocatalysts

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 2050-2060

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm903472p

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High quality brookite TiO2 nanorods have been obtained by the thermal hydrolysis of commercially available aqueous solutions of titanium bis(ammonium lactate) dihydroxide in the pressure of high connectrations of urea (>= 6.0 M) as an in situ OH- source. Biphasial anatase/brookite mixtures are obtained at lower urea concentrations. The ratios between anatase and brookite can readily be tailored by the control of the urea concentration. Ths obtained powders have been characterized by X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, field emission-scanning electron microscopy, high-resolution transmision electrno microscopy, UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra, and nitrogen adsorption. The photocatalytic activity of pure anatase nanoparticle, of anatase/brookite mixtures, and of pure brookite nanorods has been assessed by hydrogen evoluation from aquecous methanol solution as well as by the degradation of dichloroacetic acid (DCA) in aqueous solution. The result indicate that the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity of anatase/brookite mixtures and of pure brookite is higher than that of pure anatase nanoparticles despote of the lower surface area of the former. This behavior is explained by the fact that the conduction band edge of brookite phase TiO2 is shifted more cathodically than that of anatase as experimentally evidence under dark and UV-vis illumination conditions. On the contrary, in case of the photocatalytic degradation of DCA, anatase/brookite mixtures and pure brookite exhibit lower photocatalytic activity than pure anatase nanoparticiles. This behavior correlates well with the surface area of the investigated powders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available