4.8 Article

Li2O Removal from Li5FeO4: A Cathode Precursor for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 1263-1270

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm902713m

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  2. NSERC
  3. University of Washington
  4. Simon Fraser University
  5. Advanced Photon Source

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium has been extracted both electrochemically and chemically from the defect antifluorite-type structure, Li5FeO4 (5Li(2)O center dot Fe2O3). The electrochemical data show that four lithium ions can be removed from Li5FeO4 between 3.5 and 4.5 V. vs Li-0. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) data of electrochemically delithiated samples show evidence of some Fe3+ to Fe4+ oxidation during the initial charge. On the other hand, XAS data of chemically delithiated samples show no evidence of Fe3+ to Fe4+ oxidation, but rather a change in coordination of the Fe3+ ions from tetrahedral to octahedral coordination, suggesting that lithium extraction from Li5FeO4 is accompanied predominantly by the release of oxygen, the net loss being lithia (Li2O); the residual lithium-iron-oxide product has a Fe2O3-rich composition. The high lithium content in Li5FeO4 renders it an attractive cathode precursor for loading the graphite (C-6) anode of lithium-ion electrochemical cells with sufficient lithium to enable the discharge of a charged component in the parent cathode, Li1.2V3O8, as well as the residual Fe2O3-rich component. The electrochemical behavior of C-6/Li5FeO4-Li1.2V3O8 lithium-ion cells is compared to C-6/Li2MnO3-Li1.2V3O8 cells containing a layered Li2MnO3 (Li2O center dot MnO2) cathode precursor with a lower Li2O content, from which lithia can be extracted at higher potentials, typically > 4 V vs metallic lithium. The ability to remove Li2O electrochemically from metal oxide host structures with a high lithium content, such as Li5FeO4, has implications for Li-air cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available