4.8 Article

Interplay between Energetic and Kinetic Factors on the Ambient Stability of n-Channel Organic Transistors Based on Perylene Diimide Derivatives

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 21, Issue 22, Pages 5508-5518

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm902531d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BASF SE [NSC-095-SAF-1-564-626-TMS]
  2. NSF-DMR
  3. Sloan Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of the interplay between energetic and kinetic factors on the air stability of n-channel organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs) were studied using two perylene diimide (PDI) compounds with distinctly different lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) levels. On the basis of the empirical energy level windows, one compound (N,N'-bis(2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,5-nonafluoropentyl)-3,4:9,10-tetracarboxylic acid diimide (PDI-F): -3.84 eV) is at the onset region for air stability, whereas the other (N,N'-bis(cyclohexyl)-1,7-dicyano-perylene-3,4:9,10-tetracarboxylic acid diimide (PDI-CN2): -4.33 eV) is in the air-stable region. Charge-transport behaviors under an inert atmosphere and in air were investigated as a function of active layer thickness. Charge transport in air was greatly affected by the active layer thickness for both compounds, an effect that has been overlooked so far. The ambient stability of the air-unstable PDI-F TFTs increased significantly for thicknesses over similar to 10 monolayers (ML). Surprisingly, the previously considered air-stable PDI-CN2 TFTs were not stable in air if the active layer thickness was less than similar to 4 ML. The molecular packing and orientation of the PDI thin Films were investigated using grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXD) and near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS). We found that the minimum thickness required for air stability is closely related to the LUMO level, film morphology, and film growth mode.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available