4.8 Article

Photo and Electrochemical Characteristics Dependent on the Phase Ratio of Nanocolumnar Structured TiO2 Films by RF Magnetron Sputtering Technique

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages 2777-2788

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm900378c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. KOSEF [R01-2004-000-10143-0]
  2. Research Center for Energy Conversion and Storage [R11-2002-102-00000-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanostructured titanium dioxide (TiO2) prepared by RF magnetron sputtering was grown at substrate ternperatures (T-sub) ranging from RT (25 degrees C) to 450 degrees C. At lower temperatures, the TiO2 film deposited at a high sputtering pressure (12 mTorr) was amorphous. This was due to adatoms being unable to migrate effectively on the Substrate. However, an increase in T-sub, provides additional thermal energy and promotes the formation of the rutile at high temperature. The postannealing process provides additional driving force for nucleating the amorphous phase to anatase or rutile, followed by the growth of the rutile grain size. A 2.2 mu m thick TiO2 film sputtered at 350 degrees C had a columnar structure and showed the best performance as a photoanode layer for a dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC), with a V-oc of 0.65 J(sc) a Jsc of 7.93 mA/cm(2), a fill factor of 0.533, and efficiency of 2.74%. In addition, the durable electrochromic performance was also confirmed using 400 nm thick TiO2 films sputtered at 350 degrees C. The improved properties were attributed to the formation of a mixed crystalline phase with anatase and rutile, a porous structure, and the narrowing of the optical band gap because of the formation of rutile, trap sites, and surface states. Furthermore, the calculated porosity of the TiO2 film sputtered at 350 degrees C also showed a high value (similar to 60%). which contributes to the increase in surface area and is in close contact to the electrolyte.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available