4.3 Article

An empirical approach to the determination of metal regional Sediment Quality Guidelines, in marine waters, within the European Water Framework Directive

Journal

CHEMISTRY AND ECOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 205-220

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02757540.2011.651129

Keywords

marine sediments; Sediment Quality Guidelines; metals; Basque Country; Water Framework Directive

Funding

  1. Fundacion Centros Tecnologicos-Inaki Goenaga
  2. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia
  3. Fondo Social Europeo
  4. Basque Water Agency
  5. Spanish Ministry of Education and Sciences [CTM2006-13880-C03-03/MAR]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Regional Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQG) for metals from the Basque Country (northern Spain) were determined. These guidelines are proposed to be used for management purposes, within the Water Framework Directive (WFD). SQG were determined on the basis of sediment chemistry, toxicity and benthic community disturbance, from 961 estuarine and coastal samples. The guidelines were calculated using a percentile approach (effect and non-effect data), following normalisation on the fine-sediment content and with non-normalisation. The feasibility of SQG was quantified by the incidence of adverse effects, that is, the ratio of effect/no-effect data, which increased significantly with increasing SQG ranges. The study proposes the following formula to calculate SQG: SQG(metal) = SQG(metal)* mu g.g(-1)/FC. 10(-2) (where FC is fine-sediment content and SQG* is the normalised SQG). The SQG* were 13.5 mu g.g(-1) for As, 1 mu g.g(-1) for Cd, 39 mu g.g(-1) for Cr, 55 mu g.g(-1) for Cu, 0.53 mu g.g(-1) for Hg, 23 mu g.g(-1) for Ni, 78 mu g.g(-1) for Pb and 249 mu g.g(-1) for Zn. The use of four different organisational biological levels ensures an improvement in the determination of metal regional SQG for the assessment of the chemical and physicochemical status in marine waters, within the WFD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available