4.7 Article

Drastic decrease in dopamine receptor levels in the striatum of acetylcholinesterase knock-out mouse

Journal

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
Volume 183, Issue 1, Pages 194-201

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2009.09.025

Keywords

AChE-/- mouse; Cholinergic system; Dopaminergic system; Adaptation changes; Striatum

Funding

  1. VEGA [1/2271/05]
  2. GAUK [519/07]
  3. GACR [309/090406]
  4. [SK-CZ-08706]
  5. [DAMD17-01-2-0036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The acetylcholinesterase knock-out mouse lives to adulthood despite 60-fold elevated acetylcholine concentrations in the brain that are lethal to wild-type animals. Part of its mechanism of survival is a 50% decrease in muscarinic and nicotinic receptors and a 50% decrease in adrenoceptor levels. Hypothesis: The hypothesis was tested that the dopaminergic neuronal system had also adapted. Methods: Radioligand binding assays measured dopamine receptor level and binding affinity in the striatum. Immunohistochemistry of brain sections with specific antibodies visualized dopamine transporter. Effects on the intracellular compartment were measured as CAMP content, PI-phospholipase C activity. Results: Dopamine receptor levels were decreased 28-fold for the D-1-like, and more than 37-fold for the D-2-like receptors, though binding affinity was normal. Despite these huge changes in receptor levels. dopamine transporter levels were not affected. The intracellular compartment had normal levels of CAMP and PI-phospholipase C activity. Conclusion: Survival of the acetylcholinesterase knock-out mouse could be linked to adaptation of many neuronal systems during development including the cholinergic. adrenergic and dopaminergic. These adaptations balance the overstimulation of cholinergic receptors caused by high acetylcholine concentrations and thus maintain homeostasis inside the cell, allowing the animal to live. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available