4.7 Article

Protective effects of Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb761) and its constituents quercetin and ginkgolide B against β-amyloid peptide-induced toxicity in SH-SY5Y cells

Journal

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
Volume 181, Issue 1, Pages 115-123

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2009.05.010

Keywords

A beta (1-42); Apoptosis; EGb761; Quercetin; Ginkgolide B

Funding

  1. Medical Sciences Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [B2007035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ginkgo biloba extract EGb761 has been shown to protect against beta-amyloid peptide (A beta)-induced neurotoxicity but the specific mechanisms remain unclear. In the present study, effects of EGb761 and two of its constituents, quercetin and ginkgolide B, on the cytotoxic action of A beta (1-42) were tested with human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. We found that EGb761 was able to block A beta (1-42)-induced cell apoptosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, mitochondrial dysfunction and activation of c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and Akt signaling pathways. Both quercetin and ginkgolide B may be involved in the inhibitory effects of EGb761 on JNK, ERK1/2 and Akt signaling pathways. Ginkgolide B also helped to improve mitochondrial functions but quercetin failed to show this effect. Additional experiments suggest that. protective effects of EGb761 against A beta toxicity may be associated with its antioxidant and platelet activating factor (PAF) antagonist activities. Quercetin but not ginkgolide B is one of the constituents responsible for the antioxidant action of EGb761. Both quercetin and ginkgolide B may be involved in the PAF antagonist activity of EGb761. Overall, actions of individual EGb761 components provide further insights into direct mechanisms underlying the neuroprotective effects of EGb761. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available