4.7 Article

Prediction of non-genotoxic carcinogenesis in rats using changes in gene expression following acute dosing

Journal

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
Volume 172, Issue 3, Pages 206-215

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2008.01.009

Keywords

non-genotoxic carcinogenesis; gene signature; gene expression changes; 2-year bioassay; short-term dosing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-genotoxic carcinogenicity of chemicals is currently routinely evaluated in 2-year rodent bioassays. Therefore, the development of early biomarkers for non-genotoxic carcinogenesis would result in substantial savings in time and expense. The current study investigates whether early changes in gene expression may be developed as markers for cancer. Animals were treated for I or 5 days with either non-genotoxic carcinogens (NGTCs) or non-carcinogens and gene expression was analyzed by quantitative PCR (qPCR). We tested two gene signatures previously reported to detect non-genotoxic carcinogens. Using one gene signature it was confirmed that 3/3 non-genotoxic carcinogens and 2/2 non-carcinogens are correctly identified with data from I or 5 days of dosing. In contrast an alternative signature correctly identified 0/3 and 2/3 non-genotoxic carcinogens at I and 5 days of treatment, respectively and 2/2 non-carcinogens at both time-points. Additionally, we evaluated a novel panel of putative biomarker genes, from the literature, many of which have roles in cell growth and division, including myc, cdc2 and mcnz6. These genes were significantly induced by non-genotoxic carcinogens and not by non-carcinogens. Using the average fold-induction across this panel, 2/3 non-genotoxic carcinogens were detected at both I and 5 days. These data support the idea that acute changes in gene expression may provide biomarkers for non-genotoxic carcinogenesis but also highlight interesting differences in the sensitivities of distinct gene signatures. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available