4.8 Review

Cancer cell nucleus-targeting nanocomposites for advanced tumor therapeutics

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 47, Issue 18, Pages 6930-6946

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8cs00081f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51502326]
  2. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by China Association for Science and Technology [YESS20160052]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor therapeutic efficacy is determined, to a great extent, by the delivery efficiency of therapeutic drugs to their final targets. The cell nucleus has been proven to be the main interaction site for most therapeutic agents such as anticancer drugs, genes, free radicals, and heat. Therefore, it is highly expected that cell nucleus-targeting or nuclear membrane-penetrating nanotherapeutics would provide a more effective strategy than ordinary cell membrane-targeting ones for benefiting precise nanomedicine in humans' battles against cancer. This tutorial review presents a summary of the most recent progress achieved in the design, synthesis, and application of cell nucleus-targeting nanotherapeutics. We first discuss a number of design principles involved in cell nucleus-targeting nanotherapeutics, including size control, shape regulation, and surface modification. Next, we demonstrate the diverse applications of cell nucleus-targeting nanotherapeutics ranging from chemotherapy, gene therapy, photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy to synergistic therapy. Moreover, a number of typical nanotherapeutics designed for enhanced therapeutic efficacy by targeting other subcellular organelles (such as mitochondria, lysosomes, and endoplasmic reticulum) are also briefly discussed. Finally, perspectives and challenges in this research field are proposed, in the hope of accelerating their translation into the clinic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available