4.8 Review

A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 631-675

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3cs60323g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21173039]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education, SRFD [20110075110001]
  3. Innovation Program of the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0828]
  5. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [11230700600]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  7. State Environmental Protection Engineering Center for Pollution Treatment and Control in the Textile Industry of China
  8. Sendai Kankyo Kaihatsu Corporation, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews recent progress made in identifying electrocatalysts for carbon dioxide ( CO2) reduction to produce low-carbon fuels, including CO, HCOOH/HCOO-, CH2O, CH4, H2C2O4/HC2O4-, C2H4, CH3OH, CH3CH2OH and others. The electrocatalysts are classified into several categories, including metals, metal alloys, metal oxides, metal complexes, polymers/clusters, enzymes and organic molecules. The catalyts' activity, product selectivity, Faradaic efficiency, catalytic stability and reduction mechanisms during CO2 electroreduction have received detailed treatment. In particular, we review the effects of electrode potential, solution-electrolyte type and composition, temperature, pressure, and other conditions on these catalyst properties. The challenges in achieving highly active and stable CO2 reduction electrocatalysts are analyzed, and several research directions for practical applications are proposed, with the aim of mitigating performance degradation, overcoming additional challenges, and facilitating research and development in this area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available