4.8 Review

Nanomaterials for energy conversion and storage

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 42, Issue 7, Pages 3127-3171

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3cs00009e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences [DE-FG02-07ER46467]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR 1035196, CMMI 1030048]
  3. Royalty Research Fund (RRF) from the Office of Research at University of Washington

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanostructured materials are advantageous in offering huge surface to volume ratios, favorable transport properties, altered physical properties, and confinement effects resulting from the nanoscale dimensions, and have been extensively studied for energy-related applications such as solar cells, catalysts, thermoelectrics, lithium ion batteries, supercapacitors, and hydrogen storage systems. This review focuses on a few select aspects regarding these topics, demonstrating that nanostructured materials benefit these applications by (1) providing a large surface area to boost the electrochemical reaction or molecular adsorption occurring at the solid-liquid or solid-gas interface, (2) generating optical effects to improve optical absorption in solar cells, and (3) giving rise to high crystallinity and/or porous structure to facilitate the electron or ion transport and electrolyte diffusion, so as to ensure the electrochemical process occurs with high efficiency. It is emphasized that, to further enhance the capability of nanostructured materials for energy conversion and storage, new mechanisms and structures are anticipated. In addition to highlighting the obvious advantages of nanostructured materials, the limitations and challenges of nanostructured materials while being used for solar cells, lithium ion batteries, supercapacitors, and hydrogen storage systems have also been addressed in this review.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available