4.8 Review

Hallmarks of mechanochemistry: from nanoparticles to technology

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 42, Issue 18, Pages 7571-7637

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3cs35468g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Slovak Grant Agency VEGA [2/0009/11, 2/0043/11]
  2. Slovak Agency for Science and Development APVV [VV-0189-10, VV-0528-11]
  3. Centre of Excellence of Slovak Academy of Sciences (CFNT-MVEP)
  4. Slovenian Research Agency
  5. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [10-03-00942a, 12-03-00651a]
  6. Ministry of Science and Higher education in Poland [CUT/c-1/DS/KWC/2008-2012, PB1T09B02330, NN209145136, NN209148936]
  7. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  8. EPFL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this review article on recent developments of mechanochemistry (nowadays established as a part of chemistry) is to provide a comprehensive overview of advances achieved in the field of atomistic processes, phase transformations, simple and multicomponent nanosystems and peculiarities of mechanochemical reactions. Industrial aspects with successful penetration into fields like materials engineering, heterogeneous catalysis and extractive metallurgy are also reviewed. The hallmarks of mechanochemistry include influencing reactivity of solids by the presence of solid-state defects, interphases and relaxation phenomena, enabling processes to take place under non-equilibrium conditions, creating a well-crystallized core of nanoparticles with disordered near-surface shell regions and performing simple dry time-convenient one-step syntheses. Underlying these hallmarks are technological consequences like preparing new nanomaterials with the desired properties or producing these materials in a reproducible way with high yield and under simple and easy operating conditions. The last but not least hallmark is enabling work under environmentally friendly and essentially waste-free conditions (822 references).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available