4.8 Review

Tailored crystalline microporous materials by post-synthesis modification

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 263-290

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35196j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French Research Agency [ANR-2010-BLAN-723]
  2. Bulgarian National Science Fund [DTK 02-47]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021-134572]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crystalline microporous solids are an important class of inorganic materials with uses in different areas impacting our everyday lives, namely as catalysts, adsorbents, and ion exchangers. Advancements in synthesis have been invaluable in expanding the classical aluminosilicate zeolites to new unique framework types and compositions, motivating innovative developments. However, the inexhaustible post-synthetic options to tailor zeolite properties have been and will continue to be indispensable to realize emerging and to improve conventional applications. Starting from the routine drying and template removal processes that every zeolite must experience prior to use, a wide spectrum of treatments exists to alter individual or collective characteristics of these materials for optimal performance. This review documents the toolbox of post-synthetic strategies available to tune the properties of zeolitic materials for specific functions. The categorisation is based on the scale at which the alteration is aimed at, including the atomic structure (e. g. the introduction, dislodgment, or replacement of framework atoms), the micropore level (e. g. template removal and functionalisation by inorganic and organic species), and the crystal and particle levels (e. g. the introduction of auxiliary porosity). Through examples in the recent literature, it is shown that the combination of post-synthetic methods enables rational zeolite design, extending the characteristics of these materials way beyond those imposed by the synthesis conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available