4.8 Review

One hundred years of helicene chemistry. Part 1: non-stereoselective syntheses of carbohelicenes

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 968-1006

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35154d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Aix-Marseille University
  2. French Ministry of Higher Education and Research (MESR)
  3. French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS)
  4. ANR Glycoasterix [PCV08_322689]
  5. ANR BioNanoPlasmon
  6. ANR LaserNanoBio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbohelicenes belong to a class of fascinating, chiral, and helicoidal molecules, which have a rich history in chemistry since the very beginning of the 20th century. A renewed interest in polyaromatic chemistry and new synthetic challenges toward the search for innovative physical, biological, chemical and opto-electronic properties have brought high motivation in this field of studies. Theoretical insights gained from polyaromatic, chiral, conjugated and distorted pi-systems are also responsible for this development. Several synthetic avenues were originally reported for making lower helicenes, but for many years, photochemical synthesis has remained a major method for producing small amount of helicenes. High-dilution conditions is still a limiting factor in their synthesis. The fulgurous impact of organometallic chemistry, novel synthetic methods, and recent catalytic systems has promoted the development of helicene chemistry, toward a library of tailor-made and highly functionalized helicene molecules. Helicene chemistry is being considered as an expanding and modern field, leading to several applications in supramolecular chemistry, in nanosciences, in chemical-biology, in polymers and materials science. This first part of a series of three reviews on carbohelicenes will be devoted to a comprehensive report on non-stereoselective reactions and methods for producing helicenes, along with their functionalization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available