4.5 Article

Presence of Neuropathic Pain May Explain Poor Performances on Olfactory Testing in Diabetes Mellitus Patients

Journal

CHEMICAL SENSES
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages 497-507

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjt013

Keywords

diabetic neuropathic pain; diabetic neuropathy; olfaction; type 2 diabetes mellitus

Funding

  1. Alberta Heritage Medical Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative conditions such as Parkinsons syndrome and Alzheimers disease can hallmark disease onset. We hypothesized that patients with diabetes mellitus, a condition featuring peripheral and central neurodegeneration, would have decreased olfaction abilities. We examined participants with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, participants with diabetes without diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and control participants in blinded fashion using standardized Sniffin Sticks. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy severity was quantified using the Utah Early Neuropathy Scale. Further subcategorization of diabetic peripheral neuropathy based on presence of neuropathic pain was performed with Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaires. Participants with diabetes had decreased olfactory sensitivity, impaired olfactory discrimination abilities, and reduced odor identification skills when compared with controls. However, loss of olfaction ability was, at least partially, attributed to presence of neuropathic pain on subcategory assessment, although pain severity was not associated with dysfunction. Those participants with diabetes without diabetic peripheral neuropathy and those with diabetic peripheral neuropathy without neuropathic pain had similar olfactory function as controls in general. The presence of neuropathic pain, associated with limited attention and concentration, may explain at least a portion of the olfactory dysfunction witnessed in the diabetic patient population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available