4.5 Article

Effects of Aromatic Compounds on Antennal Responses and on the Pheromone-Binding Proteins of the Gypsy Moth (Lymantria dispar)

Journal

CHEMICAL SENSES
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 291-300

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjq130

Keywords

binding affinity; electroantennogram; gypsy moth; insect; olfaction; pheromone-binding protein

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [222923-05, STPGP 307515-04, STPGP 351045-2007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Female gypsy moths emit a pheromone, (+)-disparlure, which the males follow until they locate the emitter. The male moths' antennae are covered with innervated sensory hairs, specialized in detection of the pheromone. The neurons in these sensory hairs are bathed by a solution rich in pheromone-binding protein (PBP). PBPs are soluble proteins that bind the pheromone and other odorants reversibly with variable thermodynamic and kinetic selectivity and are essential for olfactory responses. Here, we have studied the interaction between 2 gypsy moth PBPs with aromatic compounds that modulate the responses of male moth antennae to (+)-disparlure. The aromatic compounds do not elicit responses by themselves, but when administered together with pheromone, they inhibit, enhance, or prolong the electrophysiological response to the pheromone. Three interactions between the compounds and PBPs were studied: 1) the equilibrium binding of the compounds by themselves to the PBPs, 2) the equilibrium binding of the compounds in the presence of pheromone or a fluorescent reporter ligand, and 3) the effect of the compounds on the conformation of the pheromone-PBP complex. A subset of compounds causes a prolongation of the electroantennogram response, and from this study, we conclude that these compounds follow a structure-activity pattern and stabilize a particular conformer of the PBPs that appears to activate the olfactory response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available